Lina Dokuzović is currently a research fellow at the CAS Rijeka. She is also a member of the eipcp and has been working as a researcher and co-editor of the multilingual web-journal transversal since 2009 (www.transversal.at). She studied Fine Arts and received a PhD in Cultural Studies from the Academy of Fine Arts Vienna. Her research, writing, lectures, and artistic work deal with the topics of migration; knowledge production and educational policies; mechanisms of appropriation and privatization of structures such as education, culture, the body, and land; and perspectives for translocal solidarity. She has been actively involved in knowledge-based social movements in Europe and abroad. She has authored numerous articles on these topics, co-edited several anthologies, and is the author of the book Struggles for Living Learning (2016), and most recently co-editor (with Boris Buden) of the book They Will Never Walk Alone: The Life and Afterlife of Gastarbeiters (2018).
Project–title: The Financialization of Knowledge and Its Impact on Cityscapes Translocally
“Economic crisis has been a major driving force in the transformations of higher education in both the recent past as well as throughout the 20th century. In more recent years, however, the commodification of knowledge and the financialization of all things university-related – from the stratification of study programs to the speculation of debt itself – have made the links between education and crisis more visible. Namely, they have displaced the consequences of the incapacity of national governments to deal with crisis to students and teachers, inviting corporate interests into the university, and radically changing the structure of institutions as well as the city landscapes surrounding them. Departments, institutes, programs, and universities are branded, and in this process, university districts are gentrified and property values shift. These tendencies have expanded across the globe as the result of recent waves of structural reforms. In reaction, students have protested and occupied their universities in order to reclaim both the material spaces taken away from them as well as the knowledge that is now bought and sold within these spaces. This new relationship between crisis-ridden universities and the real estate market (and its own shifts and crises) and the consequent occupation of university buildings in protest exposes an important new way of looking at the links between knowledge, crisis, and architecture/cityscapes today.”
Roswitha Kersten-Pejanić completed her PhD thesis on the interrelation of linguistic norms and gender perceptions in Croatian in 2016. She holds a magister degree in history and Serbian/Croatian from Humboldt University and a master degree in EU studies from Centre International de Formation Européenne.
From 2010-2017, Roswitha was working as a research associate and lecturer at the Department of Slavic Studies and the Transdisciplinary Center for Gender Studies at Humboldt University in Berlin. She also worked as a trainer for EU fundraising both in academic and non-academic education. She is co-editor of the volume “Doing Gender – Doing the Balkans” and has published papers on issues of gender, language, discourses and Europeanization in Croatia, such as “Language ideology and linguistic manifestations of gender conceptualisations in Croatian”, “»Imenice muškog roda imenice su općeg roda…« Why Questioning Androgendering Naming Practices for People Is Still Worth the (Slavicist’s) While”, “Are times of Europeanisation times of the gender experts? The window of opportunity in the EU accession process in Croatia”, and others.
Project – Title: Linguistic Landscapes at the margins: Performativity of ethnic belonging and memory politics in Croatian post-conflict border regions
Roswitha will be a fellow at CAS SEE for the next two years while working on her project “Linguistic Landscapes at the margins: Performativity of ethnic belonging and memory politics in Croatian post-conflict border regions” which receives funding from the German Research Foundation (DFG, project number: KE 2368/1-1):
Her research concentrates on the linguistic landscape in two rural border regions and former war sites in Croatia (the “Danube border region” around Vukovar, Ilok, Erdut and Batina and the “Una border region” around Kostajnica, Dvor, Dubica and Jasenovac). A central emphasis will be on the examination of persisting linguistic signs of ethnic and nationalist tension in the public space. The continuing influence of the war and, hence, the status of this space as a post-conflict site is of particular analytic importance for this research project. By using a triangulated methodological approach based on an ethnographic perspective on language use, the interrelations of linguistic signs in public space, their political messages, the corresponding ideological origin, as well as their temporality (i.e., both the historical context in which they were produced as well as the current time, which these linguistic signs are still influencing), will be examined.
The project aims at making an active contribution to the methodological development of Linguistic Landscape Studies (LLS) by concentrating on rural landscapes, while most research in LLS so far has focused on the study of urban areas. Furthermore, the project is drawing the attention of this emerging field of ethnographic studies on language use to South Eastern Europe, which allows adding a particularly fascinating set of material and analysis due the loaded legacy of (language) politics in this region.
Bojan Baća is an Ernst Mach Postdoctoral Fellow at the Center for Southeast European Studies, University of Graz and a Junior Research Fellow at the Center for Advanced Studies, University of Rijeka. He received his PhD in Sociology from York University, to which he still remains affiliated as a research associate in the Global Digital Citizenship Lab. In 2015–2016, he was a Swedish Institute Visiting Doctoral Fellow at the University of Gothenburg, specializing in post-socialist civil society and social movement research. Baća continues to explore the relationship between socio-economic/political transformation and civic engagement in post-socialist societies and, more broadly, the role of activist citizenship and contentious politics in democratization processes. His recent work on the topic was published in academic journals such as Antipode and Europe-Asia Studies, as well as in two edited volumes: Changing Youth Values in Southeast Europe: Beyond Ethnicity (Routledge, 2017) and The Democratic Potential of Emerging Social Movements in Southeastern Europe (Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2017). As a fellow at the Center for Advanced Studies, Baća is conducting a research project that focuses on English-speaking digital public sphere in the “post-truth era”, in which he explores how digitalization of the “marketplace of ideas” is articulating, mobilizing, and legitimizing political ideas, social actors, and cultural practices that are spreading disinformation and promoting anti-democratic sentiments.
Project title: Digitalization of the Marketplace of (Reactionary) Ideas: The Alt-Right as a Political Ideology, Social Movement, and Counter-Culture
“The proposed project explores the emerging phenomenon of the alternative right, or the “Alt-Right”, as a multidimensional phenomenon – that is, as a political ideology, social movement, and counter-culture. By taking a position of critical sociology, which is also informed by numerous interdisciplinary fields, and utilizing a mixed-methods approach of critical discourse analysis, topic modelling, and social network analysis, the proposed project analyzes how the digital has molded and steered the political towards the right on social media platforms. This occurs at the level of various reactionary ideas, through networking of diverse right-wing collectives, as well as through the spread of novel cultural practices of “fighting the PC culture and SJWs”. In the proposed project, the focus is specifically on how the digitalization of the public sphere – fostered by the rapid rise of new technologies and social networking platforms – has increased and shaped political engagement of the reactionary segments of global civil society.”
Ivan Flis is currently a research fellow at CAS Rijeka. He holds a PhD in history and philosophy of science from Utrecht University, the Netherlands and a Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees in psychology from the Center for Croatian Studies at the University of Zagreb. He is a psychologist turned historian/philosopher of science, with his research focusing on three areas: (1) history of scientific psychology in late 20th century (2) history and philosophy of research methods in psychology and the ongoing replication crisis; (3) and studying and participating in Open Science as a reform movement. His ongoing goal is trying to apply historically-informed metascience (philosophy of science, sociology of science, scientometrics) to constructively criticizing research practices in scientific psychology. During his career, he acted as the editor and editor-in-chief of the Journal of European Psychology Students, Associate Editor of the Directory of Open Access Journals, and the editor of the collaborative history of science blog Shells and Pebbles. He also advocates and writes in support of Open Science and Open Access.
Project title: Open Science as a Movement of Digital Disruption
“In my CAS-SEE project, I aim to explore Open Science as a disruptive digital movement which targets social conventions that are central to the functioning of the science system. Fundamentally, Open Science advocates are trying to change, by digital means, the institutions that are conduits for their own social dynamics. The movement mixes the discussions of epistemological prescription (what is the proper way of conducting and publishing scientific research?), the current economic reality of doing science (what is the role of corporate stakeholders like publishers on one hand, and government and private funding agencies on the other?), and moral language (what do we owe to the public, the taxpayer funding us, and ultimately, to humanity?). If we take to heart the basic view of contemporary historians and sociologists of science, the social practices of scientists are what science is. A grassroots movement of scientists, then, is a transformative project for changing the nature of science as we know it. And in large part, I would argue, the transformation is conducted and enacted through digital means. I plan to investigate these topics through two case studies: (1) one on the question what predatory Open Access publishers are and the other (2) on the role of Open Science as an answer to psychology’s replicability crisis. Both case studies are a continuation of my doctoral research, expanding the philosophical historical study into contemporary issues.”
Nilay Kilinc obtained her PhD from University of Surrey and her MA in European Studies from Lund University. Her PhD thesis explored the Turkish-German return migrants’ quest for ‘search for self’ in the Mediterranean tourism hub of Turkey, Antalya. She recently completed a 10-month postdoc research fellowship at New Europe College, Bucharest wherein she focused on the deportation-wellbeing nexus for the second-generation Turkish migrants from Germany who had to force return to Turkey due to their youth crimes, and their self-healing and social integration practices.
Project – title: Highly-Skilled Turkish Migrants’ Search for Alternative Diaspora Spaces in Europe: How They Build (Digital) Social Networks Beyond the ‘Culture of Rejection’
“This research project explores the highly-skilled Turkish migrants’ perceptions of their everyday-life experiences in three spheres: a) at their work places, b) with the wider social community (‘the dominant Other’ in their respective European host society) and, c) the wider Turkish diaspora community (which is a heterogeneous group). The project focuses on the narratives of individual identity vis-à-vis the general group identity (i.e. Turkish diaspora in their respective European host society and the host society) and how they build/maintain alternative social networks (also digital ones) based on such perceptions, their social statuses, professions and lifestyles. The research focuses on the highly-skilled Turkish community in three EU states, namely Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands wherein the Turkish community is one of the largest migrant group. The study explores the production of alternative diaspora spaces in migrants’ social environments (i.e. work spaces) and digital spheres through mixed methods (collecting narrative life-story interviews via Skype or face-to-face and conducting surveys, as well as observing the digital platforms and migrants’ input through digital ethnography). The premise is, highly-skilled migrants experience cultural rejection mainly from the Turkish diaspora groups, hence look for ways to culturally integrate themselves to the wider European society, especially benefitting from digital platforms. Theoretically, the aim is to establish ‘alternative diasporas’ as a concept wherein individuals have more contested feelings and attachments towards their native communities and ‘given’ identities whilst they pursue the interest of connecting with others who share similar interests, lifestyles, ethics etc. (e.g. LGBTQ platforms, arts & culture organisations, academic platforms, Green Party, feminist organisations). Consequently, the overall objective is to explore how these highly-skilled migrants blur or sharpen the boundaries of their in/out-group status with the wider native diaspora community as well as the host society.”
Dragana Kovacevic Bielicki is a social researcher focusing mainly on forced migration, nationalism, groupism, and identity and belonging in discourse. Based in Norway since 2009, she received a PhD in Migration, Nationalism and Culture Studies in 2016 from the Faculty of Humanities, University of Oslo. A monograph based on her doctoral research was published in 2017 with the title Born in Yugoslavia- Raised in Norway: Former Child Refugees and Belonging (Oslo, Novus Press, 2017). In addition, she holds degrees from Central European University (MA, Nationalism Studies) and the University of Belgrade (BA, Philosophy). She is a returning lecturer for the Peace Scholars program at the International Summer School, University of Oslo.
Project – title: Mapping the anti-migrant protests in Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina through their online media coverage (2015-present)
“The “migrant crisis” in Europe in 2015 and beyond has resulted in an abundance of pro- and anti-migration discourses and practices. The continuous arrival and transit of migrants has been accompanied by rising anti-migration sentiments and reactions. This small-scale project focuses on the organized anti-migrant protests in three transit countries along the Western Balkan migration route: Serbia, Croatia, and Bosnia and Herzegovina between 2015 and present. Protests are one of the most visible practices used to express rejection of any social phenomenon, also a practice that tends to attract media attention. This is why, in addition to mapping the protests so far organized, this research will seek to explain how these protests are covered and framed by the online media, and what experiences and discourses fuel the rejection of migrants and migration. This small-scale study will theoretically be framed through the notion of interdiscursivity, seen as the key to understanding how discursive change is related to social change. The hypothesis is that online news media and social media are among the most prominent environments relevant to the reproduction of cultures of rejection and cultures of acceptance alike. Digital ethnography is the method I will employ to collect material, while the analyzes of the material will be informed by Multimodal Critical Discourse Analyses.”
Francesca Rolandi received a Phd in Slavic Studies at the University of Turin in 2012 with a dissertation on the influence of Italian popular culture on socialist Yugoslavia, which in 2014 received the award Vinka Kitarovic of the University of Bologna for thesis dealing with the history of neighbouring countries. She has been a postdoctoral research at the Italian Institute for Historical Studies in Naples, the University of Rijeka (Marie Curie – NEWFELPRO fellowship), and the University of Ljubljana (ERC project EIRENE Postwar Transitions in Gendered Perspective: The Case of the North-Eastern Adriatic Region). Her research interests range from the social and cultural history of the Upper Adriatic area and the post-Yugoslav space to the history of refugees and migration in the 20th century.
Project – title: Doš’o sam u grad iz pasivnog kraja. Internal Migration, Settlement Dynamics and Social Practices in post-World War II Rijeka
“This project aims to investigate the settlement process and internal migration flows in post-World War II Rijeka, tracing their influence on the urban fabric of the city. Post-war reconstruction required a sharp increase in labor force to replace the many local inhabitants who left as a consequence of the new border setting and fulfill the needs of the local industry. The new immigrants who reached the city came not just from the surrounding areas but also from other more faraway regions, including the southern Yugoslav republics.
This project will shed some light on the policies adopted by the Yugoslav authorities to repopulate the city, including the process of negotiation with the local context. Moreover, it will analyze these migration flows taking into account national but also class and gender aspects. Focusing on specific, carefully selected, places, where wider phenomena were displayed, it will investigate the impact of the practices of consumption, housing policies, dynamics of social inclusion or exclusion on the process of identity building.”
Project – title: The Slovene Reaction to the European Migrant Crisis: Class and Ideology at the edge of Schengen
“The European response to the 2015 migrant crisis was initially featured by warm welcome expressions from the European elites, especially from EU institutions and the German government. However, it quickly evolved into the enhancement of extremist positions and the “Fortress Europe” pretension. The opposition to the limited European Commission’s relocation and resettlement plan – initially led by the Czech Republic, Hungary, Romania and Slovakia – ended up in the conclusion of an agreement with Turkey for the return of asylum-seekers to that country. Along this process, governments, mainstream political parties and new far-right organizations have shaped cultural-related and seemingly technical discursive lines for rationalizing the exclusion and rejection of migrants. In the case of the Slovene elites, the justification for the closure of the “Balkan route” of refugees in September 2015 relied in the assumption of their responsibility to protect the Schengen external border and in the intention of remaining in the core of an eventual multi-speed Europe.
This project aims to define the state of the ideology within the Slovene ruling class during the migrant crisis, considering that ideological trends do not solely respond to agency, but also to structural relations, which take place inside polities and at the transnational level. The peripheral position of Slovenia within the EU and the consequences of the European economic crisis are departing points for assessing the existence of a contagion in the region after the arrival of migrants.”
Project – title: Spatializing Cultural Policies and Activism in Croatia and Romania: A Comparative, Transnational Study
“For decades now, many European cities have embraced a repertoire of cultural policies thought to stimulate spatial development —such as the cultural mega-event or the Bilbao-emulating contemporary art museum — and democratic practice— including diverse processes, ranging from the spatial memorialization of public crimes to an opening to citizen participation and inclusion. Participation and inclusiveness in city-making have been packaged in EU documents as a “European best practice”. Exported through various EU channels in new member states, these policies intersected –and at times clashed- with a strong local activism and grassroots organization calling in particular for more inclusive, participatory practices. My project will explore in a comparative and transnational frame the spatialisation and democratization of cultural policy in two such contexts, Croatia and Romania. It will examine the entanglements of various actors at the local scale, as well as similarities, differences and links between urban activism and policies in the two countries, often researched separately because of language limitations, historical differentiations, as well as narratives and imaginaries of exceptionalism. Aiming to understand the wider region as a space of flows of ideas and practices, and using the lens of comparative urbanism, I will explore how two particular themes in cultural policy and activism have been included in debates of spatial development and inclusiveness: the cultural mega-event and the process of memorialization. First, I will scrutinize the role of European Capital of Culture bids in spatial development and inclusive city-making, with a particular focus on how the theme of participation has been mobilized in the bids for capital of culture in Rijeka, Zagreb, Timisoara and Bucharest. Second, I will build on my current research as part of the AHRC-Labex research project “Criminalization of Dictatorial Pasts in Europe and Latin America in Global Perspective” to investigate the spatialisation of memory policies and politics and the entanglements between actors, both locally and transnationally.”
Project – title: Mapping of Spatial Memory in Limitrophe Cities: Border-Landscapes and Border-Bodies
“The project draws on political meanings of borders which are perpetually blurred and shifted in tidal geography of continuous phenomenological evolution undergoing cultural mummification and erasure of preexisting maps. In the societal porosity context, where we are witnessing a revival of “quick sand” cultural boundaries, I shall focus on the production of new map of borders, flows of non-targeted displacements and dislocations, indeterminate journeys and nostalgia for a lost space instigated by the political shattering of urban zones. The corpus of my research are social actors and artists inhabiting Istria region who are disintegrating, misplacing, reinventing and questioning invisible boundaries in urban landscapes and the interstice of artistic, nominal and liminal interpretations. I plan to elaborate interventions reflecting space, new monuments, mapping of memory, mental landscapes, re-formed urban spaces. The larger context remains in the European border politics emerged from spatial reconfigurations. I draw on Italian, Slovenian and Croatians artists inhabiting Istria arguing forms of belonging, artistic exile and self-definition that unveil interrelations of cultural mutation processes from common spatial memory towards transitory emotional memory. The goal is to rethink the interconnected mapping and bordering meanings, which have become marginalized, detached, diasporic but at the same time a center and a nucleus of creativity, ontological uncertainty, cognitive anxiety, diversifying identifications and proliferating movements and unpredictable trajectories in a city. The question I am tackling is: is it so important to draw boundaries, charts and maps when the world has turned culturally liminal, flow and creolizing?”
Project – title: Read, Think, Act
“In an unstable and shifting world with growing social injustices, the ability to think critically and creatively, as well as to show solidarity with others, could be a path to social change. The aim of my research is to interdisciplinary connect Adorno’s concept of education for “general enlightenment” to the act of critical and creative reading. The questions are: can the merging of critical and literary theory give us some answers on how to enhance critical thinking? Can reading fiction encourage the development of open-minded, solidary people ready for change?
I shall define and analyze the connection between reading literature and becoming an autonomous subject. I will connect Adorno’s views to literary theory and phenomenology, in order to inspect how creative and critical reading of literature can heighten our empathy, along the lines of the theory of Martha Nussbaum. In the light of Marx’s claim that one should educate the educators, I will implement my theoretical findings at the critical reading workshop with the students of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences at the University of Rijeka. We will read creatively and try to imagine alternative, better ways of living.”
Project – title: Architecture as ideology: The perspectives of critical theory from modernism to the present
“A basic entry point to reflect on architecture, which has always been deeply connected with ideology, in the realm of critical theory is explicated by Fredric Jameson in Political Unconscious:
“How is it possible for a cultural text that fulfils a demonstrably ideological function, as a hegemonic work whose formal categories as well as its content secure the legitimation of this or that form of class domination – how is it possible for such a text to embody a properly utopian impulse, or to resonate a universal value inconsistent with the narrower limits of class privilege that inform its more immediate ideological vocation?”
The ideological function of architecture is the key focus of this project. Architecture will be held here as a prominent theoretical ground for the spatial formation of ideology as such. Critical theory has largely elaborated on the formation and understanding of ideology within architecture during the age of modernism (Benjamin, Adorno) and postmodernism (Tafuri, Jameson), as well as in neoliberalism.
The aim of the project is to prepare an article outlining the basic reception of architecture in critical theory from modernism to the present, in order to reflect on architecture as a spatial formation of ideology in the age of neoliberalism, where architecture is established as one of the prominent battle fields of capitalism.
Project – title:Regulation of Informal Construction in Anticipation of the European Capital of Culture Rijeka 2020
“Rijeka is an odd case in the wider Croatian context of informal construction development and regulation. During the period of its largest industrial growth in the 20th century, the city did not have a problem with informal construction to the same extent as other industrial centres like Zagreb, Osijek or Split (Vresk 1997, Vresk 1998). Still, several inner city and suburban neighbourhoods developed a significant number of informally constructed buildings (Pehlin, Rujevica, Grpci, Pilepići, Rubeši, Rešetari, Srdoči, Matulji, Kostrena). Individual informal construction is commonly held culpable for disrupting urban planning and infrastructure development. It often involves socially vulnerable segments of the population, such as ethnic minorities (particularly Roma), rural to urban migrants, precarious industrial workers and war refugees, making agency and vulnerability of the actors involved in the practice a complex question. As the current dynamics of informal construction regulation in the city are soon to be altered with preparations for European Capital of Culture – Rijeka 2020 (ECC), I am interested in the ways these preparations affect informal construction regulation. Major projects such as ECC aim to attract investments and publicity. Likewise, they are frequently used to solve cities long-term ills rapidly and can serve as a justification for large developments. My research project examines the consequences ECC will have on the development of the mentioned neighbourhoods and general public infrastructure in the city; how these effects distribute towards the city periphery; and what the dynamics may hold for minorities in the city.”
Project – title: Experts, Good Citizens, Democratic Public Debates and Global Warming
“Among climate experts there is an overwhelming consensus that (i) global warming is occurring, that (ii) this fact is alarming and that (iii) humans are causally responsible for it. Despite this, 16% of American citizens deny that (i) global warming is occurring, 48% of them question (ii) its seriousness, and 50% think that (iii) human activity has no role in causing it (Anderson 2011). These discrepancies can be observed in many other countries as well. In this project I intend to provide a moral framework to assess the attitude of those citizens that, like American citizens, in democratic public debates concerning the elaboration of public policies, mistrust experts, i.e. trustworthy epistemic authorities, in regard to beliefs that are justified and almost undisputed within the scientific community. Moreover, I aim at employing this moral framework to evaluate the attitude of those citizens that mistrust climate experts, and I intend to outline some feasible proposals useful to counteract this attitude. To accomplish these aims, I will proceed in three steps. First, I will develop the non-exhaustive ideal of the good citizens publicly debating in democratic contexts. I will argue that, according to this non-exhaustive deal, as a necessary but not sufficient condition, in democratic public debates citizens show what I call the virtue of the epistemic trust in trustworthy epistemic authorities, as a way to respect themselves and each other as peers in circumstances of epistemic dependence. In more detail, by translating rawlsian ideas of both rationality and reasonableness into epistemic terms, and by broaden them in order to cover public debates too, I will show that the virtue of the epistemic trust in trustworthy epistemic authorities is required by two ideas specifying the non-exhaustive ideal of the good citizens publicly debating in democratic contexts, i.e. the idea of rational citizens, and the idea of reasonable citizens. Second, after elaborating this moral framework, I will employ it to assess the public mistrusting attitude showed, within democratic contexts, by citizens toward climate experts, and argue that it is bad, because it shows the lack of the virtue of the epistemic trust in trustworthy epistemic authorities. Finally, I will outline some public and feasible strategies that should be used to modify this bad attitude.”
Project Title: What is Wrong with Withdrawing from an International Cooperation?
“The research project aims to analyze what, if anything, is morally wrong with a state’s withdrawal from an international cooperation. The UK’s leaving the EU or the US’s withdrawing from the Paris agreement, and more recently from UNESCO are good illustrations. All three withdrawals have been broadly criticized on different practical grounds. The withdrawals, however, also have an important normative dimension. Namely, many have condemned them as being bad in some sense. I will analyze the problem at two levels. First, we may want to know what exactly, if anything is morally wrong with a state’s withdrawal from an international cooperation? Is this a case of promise breaking? Second, how do supranational integrations as well as international treaties affect legitimacy of participating states? Some might say that it is morally permissible for states to change their mind, and withdraw from an international cooperation as long as they voluntarily do so. But such view can be challenged on two grounds. First, what about those individuals within the withdrawing state that were against the withdrawal? Why should they comply? Second, what about the impact the withdrawal has on states that keep cooperating? I will use Rawls’s principle of strains of commitment to develop the normative framework for thinking about the problem of states’ withdrawing from multilateral cooperation.”
Project–title: Postsocialist Croats in postcatholic Ireland: Comparing worlds of work in contemporary variants of neoliberalism
“My project at CAS SEE explores recent Croatian migration to Ireland (2013-2018). It tackles narratives about mobility in Croatian (social) media and among individual migrants. The question guiding the project explores the experience of variants of neoliberalism in late-capitalism more broadly: What can personal narratives which compare worlds of work – subjective experiences of labour regimes in two different capitalist states – tell us about variants of neoliberalism? The guiding assumption is that socialisation in a socialist and postsocialist labour regime like Croatia may serve as a means to problematize labour regimes in contemporary Ireland and vice versa for individuals. Departing from labour and motilities, the project also explores the extent to which there are grounds for conceptualising confronting Irish post-Catholicism as a case of ‘dealing with the past’. When approaching the legacy of what was often a coercive, authoritarian, de facto theocratic socio-political order in Ireland is there any value in comparing and contrasting this to the post-conflict, post-socialist social context of Croatia and the ‘mnemonic battles’ taking place there? Are such contrasts and comparisons made by contemporary Croatian migrants themselves and does it inform their understanding of contemporary Ireland and prompt political action or social engagement?”
Project – Title: Risky Vulnerability. The Rise of Neo-Fascist Discourses and the Possibilities of Political Transformation in Judith Butler
“This research project addresses Judith Butler’s stances on neo-fascist discourses, applying her analysis to the European context, from where we are witnessing an unsettling and dangerous rise of fascism. Vulnerability is a key concept for this project, and it will be analyzed within the tension that its riskiness implies: on the one hand, it connects us to our fragility; on the other hand, it is related to our power to act, to our political agency, and it allows us to share a powerful bond that enables political stances and transformative actions.
Butler’s very recent writings on the rise of fascisms, old and new (Butler, 2017), focus on the case of the United States of America, but this research project will try to apply this analysis to the rise of populisms and fascist discourses in Europe. Regarding her thoughts on social change and political activism, this research projects aims to elucidate how Butler’s thoughts on political assembly, performative action, and solidarity (Butler, 2015) can be applied to counteractions against the rise of fascist discourses and precarizing actions.”
Project–title: Re/I:translating terRI[s]tories: architectural stories about Rijeka’s territory
“Architecture and territory are a permanent transcript – a spatial narrative on the cultural portrait of the city that is seen as a cultural palimpsest of overlapped layers of spatial and cultural transformation. Previous research about mapping the architectural stories about Rijeka’s territory (terRI[s]tories) represent a basis for the new readings of the city. The activities of the project are about re:reading and re:translating some of the terRI(s)tories for the needs of Rijeka ECOC 2020 and with the aim of transcription/documenting the only constant thing about cities – their transformation (the idea of the acronym Re/I from the title of the project was to associate to Panta Rei, cities are also in constant change, and Rijeka is well known as a “city that flows”). The expected result of this project is the atlas of cultural maps – a portrait of the city, created through the methodological examination of printed and new media forms of representation and dissemination of the research results. The main contribution of the project is it’s potential use for the purpose of education about and promotion of Rijeka.”